Accelerated Degradation Analysis Using ALTA
[Editor's Note: This article has been updated
since its original publication to reflect a more recent
version of the software interface.]
Degradation analysis involves the measurement and extrapolation of degradation
or performance data that can be directly related to the failures of a product. Many
failure mechanisms can be directly linked to the degradation of the parts of a
product, and degradation analysis allows the user to extrapolate to an expected
failure time based on the measurements of degradation or performance over
time. When accelerated testing techniques are used to reduce testing time, the
analysis of the degradation measurements obtained at the accelerated stress levels
can be extrapolated to normal use conditions. In this article, we will give an
example that uses the accelerated degradation analysis tool
in ALTA.
Consider one type of light-emitting diode (LED) in which the light intensity
changes with the current
stress and the time. A light intensity of 55 mcd is set as the failure criterion, or
critical degradation. The manufacturer wants to know the B10 life at the usage
current of 27 mA. However, the time schedule for the testing task is very tight. To
reduce the testing time, the testing group decided to conduct an accelerated
degradation test and use the accelerated degradation analysis tool
in ALTA to analyze the data.
The group tested 10 samples with 5 samples at each of the 2 accelerated current
stress levels, 35 mA and 40 mA. Table 1 shows the different light intensity
measurements collected during the test at different currents.
Table
1: LED Light Intensity with Current and Time at Different Inspection Times
Inspection Time
(hours) |
Light
Intensity
(mcd) |
Current
(mA) |
Unit ID |
50 |
86.6 |
40 |
1 |
100 |
78.7 |
40 |
1 |
150 |
76.0 |
40 |
1 |
200 |
71.6 |
40 |
1 |
250 |
68.0 |
40 |
1 |
50 |
82.1 |
40 |
2 |
100 |
71.4 |
40 |
2 |
150 |
65.4 |
40 |
2 |
200 |
61.7 |
40 |
2 |
250 |
58.0 |
40 |
2 |
50 |
82.7 |
40 |
3 |
100 |
70.3 |
40 |
3 |
150 |
64.0 |
40 |
3 |
200 |
61.3 |
40 |
3 |
250 |
59.3 |
40 |
3 |
50 |
79.8 |
40 |
4 |
100 |
68.3 |
40 |
4 |
150 |
62.3 |
40 |
4 |
200 |
60.0 |
40 |
4 |
250 |
59.0 |
40 |
4 |
50 |
75.1 |
40 |
5 |
100 |
66.7 |
40 |
5 |
150 |
62.8 |
40 |
5 |
200 |
59.0 |
40 |
5 |
250 |
54.0 |
40 |
5 |
50 |
95.1 |
35 |
6 |
100 |
86.0 |
35 |
6 |
150 |
77.6 |
35 |
6 |
200 |
70.0 |
35 |
6 |
250 |
66.7 |
35 |
6 |
50 |
93.3 |
35 |
7 |
100 |
87.1 |
35 |
7 |
150 |
79.7 |
35 |
7 |
200 |
74.3 |
35 |
7 |
250 |
73.0 |
35 |
7 |
50 |
98.3 |
35 |
8 |
100 |
92.4 |
35 |
8 |
150 |
89.0 |
35 |
8 |
200 |
84.3 |
35 |
8 |
250 |
83.0 |
35 |
8 |
50 |
96.6 |
35 |
9 |
100 |
88.2 |
35 |
9 |
150 |
85.1 |
35 |
9 |
200 |
81.4 |
35 |
9 |
250 |
78.6 |
35 |
9 |
50 |
95.8 |
35 |
10 |
100 |
89.0 |
35 |
10 |
150 |
84.0 |
35 |
10 |
200 |
81.0 |
35 |
10 |
250 |
80.0 |
35 |
10 |
They
entered the collected data into ALTA's degradation analysis
folio. For the extrapolation, they used an exponential
model for the degradation curve and set the critical
degradation to 55, as defined above. To analyze the
extrapolated failure times, they chose the inverse power
law as the life-stress model, and selected the Weibull
distribution as the failure time distribution.
They also defined the normal use stress level of 27mA by
clicking Set Use Stress in the control panel and
entering the value in the Use Stress Level window.
Figure 1 shows the resulting 10
exponential curves that were used to extrapolate the
failure times.

Figure 1: Degradation Curves in ALTA
After calculation, the control panel shows the
parameter values for beta and K, as shown in Figure 2.

Figure 1: Analysis of Failure
Times Extrapolated from the Degradation
To calculate the B10 life, they opened the Quick
Calculation Pad and entered 27 for the stress
value, and entered 10 for
the BX% Life At value. The B10 life for a current of 27 mA is about 1176 hours, as shown in Figure 4.

Figure 4: Calculating the B10 Life
using the Quick
Calculation Pad
Conclusions
In this article, we discussed degradation analysis using ALTA. As you
may know, Weibull++ also has a
degradation analysis tool. The difference
between these two degradation analyses is that in Weibull++, the
analysis is conducted at only one stress level (the use stress level) and
predictions are valid only for that stress level. In ALTA, the analysis is
conducted at elevated stress levels, and the extrapolation from the elevated
stress levels to the use stress level is based on the life-stress
relationship. Product performance can be predicted either at the use stress
level or at any level for which that life-stress relationship is applicable.
|