Reliability HotWire

Reliability HotWire

Issue 110, April 2010

Reliability Basics

Accelerated Degradation Analysis Using ALTA

Degradation analysis involves the measurement and extrapolation of degradation or performance data that can be directly related to the failures of a product. Many failure mechanisms can be directly linked to the degradation of the parts of a product, and degradation analysis allows the user to extrapolate to an expected failure time based on the measurements of degradation or performance over time. When accelerated testing techniques are used to reduce testing time, the analysis of the degradation measurements obtained at the accelerated stress levels can be extrapolated to normal use conditions. In this article, we will give an example that uses the accelerated degradation analysis tool in ALTA 7.

Consider one type of light-emitting diode (LED) in which the light intensity changes with the current stress and the time. A light intensity of 55 mcd is set as the failure criterion, or critical degradation. The manufacturer wants to know the B10 life at the usage current of 27mA. However, the time schedule for the testing task is very tight. To reduce the testing time, the testing group decided to conduct an accelerated degradation test and use the accelerated degradation analysis tool in ALTA 7 to analyze the data.

The group tested 10 samples with 5 samples at each of the 2 accelerated current stress levels, 35mA and 40mA. Table 1 shows the different light intensity measurements collected during the test at different currents.

Table 1: LED Light Intensity with Current and Time at Different Inspection Times

Inspection Time
(hours)
Light Intensity
(mcd)
Current (mA) Unit ID
50 86.6 40 1
100 78.7 40 1
150 76.0 40 1
200 71.6 40 1
250 68.0 40 1
50 82.1 40 2
100 71.4 40 2
150 65.4 40 2
200 61.7 40 2
250 58.0 40 2
50 82.7 40 3
100 70.3 40 3
150 64.0 40 3
200 61.3 40 3
250 59.3 40 3
50 79.8 40 4
100 68.3 40 4
150 62.3 40 4
200 60.0 40 4
250 59.0 40 4
50 75.1 40 5
100 66.7 40 5
150 62.8 40 5
200 59.0 40 5
250 54.0 40 5
50 95.1 35 6
100 86.0 35 6
150 77.6 35 6
200 70.0 35 6
250 66.7 35 6
50 93.3 35 7
100 87.1 35 7
150 79.7 35 7
200 74.3 35 7
250 73.0 35 7
50 98.3 35 8
100 92.4 35 8
150 89.0 35 8
200 84.3 35 8
250 83.0 35 8
50 96.6 35 9
100 88.2 35 9
150 85.1 35 9
200 81.4 35 9
250 78.6 35 9
50 95.8 35 10
100 89.0 35 10
150 84.0 35 10
200 81.0 35 10
250 80.0 35 10

For the analysis, they used an exponential extrapolation model for the degradation curve and set the critical degradation to 55, as defined above. They entered the collected data into ALTA's Degradation Analysis Folio, and the data for each LED were individually fitted with a single curve. Figure 1 shows the resulting 10 exponential curves.

Figure 1: Degradation Curves in ALTA 7

A time-to-failure was extrapolated from each curve. To transfer the failure times to an ALTA Standard Folio, they clicked the Transfer Life Data to Selected Folio(s) icon on the Data Sheet's Control Panel, as shown in Figure 2, and selected an existing Standard Folio. Figure 3 shows the calculated results.

Figure 2: Transfer Life Data to Selected Folio(s)

Figure 3: ALTA Standard Folio to Analyze the Failure Times Extrapolated from the Degradation Analysis

The extrapolated failure times were transferred to a Standard Folio with 2 stress levels and 5 failure times for each stress. They chose the inverse power law as the life-stress model, and selected the Weibull distribution as the failure time distribution. They also defined the normal use stress level of 27mA by clicking the Set Use Stress link located near the bottom of the Control Panel and entering the value in the Use Stress Level window. After calculation, the Control Panel shows the parameter values for β, K, and n. To calculate the B10 life, they opened the Quick Calculation Pad and entered the Current value of 27mA and the BX% Information At value of 10 and found that the B10 life for current of 27mA is about 1176 hours, as shown in Figure 4.

Figure 4: Calculating the B10 Life using the Quick Calculation Pad

Conclusions

In this article, we discussed degradation analysis using ALTA. As you may know, Weibull++ also has a degradation analysis tool. The difference between these two degradation analyses is that in Weibull++, the analysis is conducted at only one stress level (the use stress level) and predictions are valid only for that stress level. In ALTA, the analysis is conducted at elevated stress levels, and the extrapolation from the elevated stress levels to the use stress level is based on the life-stress relationship. Product performance can be predicted either at the use stress level or at any level for which that life-stress relationship is applicable.