Accelerated Degradation Analysis Using ALTA
Degradation analysis involves the measurement and extrapolation of degradation
or performance data that can be directly related to the failures of a product. Many
failure mechanisms can be directly linked to the degradation of the parts of a
product, and degradation analysis allows the user to extrapolate to an expected
failure time based on the measurements of degradation or performance over
time. When accelerated testing techniques are used to reduce testing time, the
analysis of the degradation measurements obtained at the accelerated stress levels
can be extrapolated to normal use conditions. In this article, we will give an
example that uses the accelerated degradation analysis tool
in ALTA 7.
Consider one type of light-emitting diode (LED) in which the light intensity
changes with the current
stress and the time. A light intensity of 55 mcd is set as the failure criterion, or
critical degradation. The manufacturer wants to know the B10 life at the usage
current of 27mA. However, the time schedule for the testing task is very tight. To
reduce the testing time, the testing group decided to conduct an accelerated
degradation test and use the accelerated degradation analysis tool
in ALTA 7 to analyze the data.
The group tested 10 samples with 5 samples at each of the 2 accelerated current
stress levels, 35mA and 40mA. Table 1 shows the different light intensity
measurements collected during the test at different currents.
Table
1: LED Light Intensity with Current and Time at Different Inspection Times
Inspection Time
(hours) |
Light
Intensity
(mcd) |
Current
(mA) |
Unit ID |
| 50 |
86.6 |
40 |
1 |
| 100 |
78.7 |
40 |
1 |
| 150 |
76.0 |
40 |
1 |
| 200 |
71.6 |
40 |
1 |
| 250 |
68.0 |
40 |
1 |
| 50 |
82.1 |
40 |
2 |
| 100 |
71.4 |
40 |
2 |
| 150 |
65.4 |
40 |
2 |
| 200 |
61.7 |
40 |
2 |
| 250 |
58.0 |
40 |
2 |
| 50 |
82.7 |
40 |
3 |
| 100 |
70.3 |
40 |
3 |
| 150 |
64.0 |
40 |
3 |
| 200 |
61.3 |
40 |
3 |
| 250 |
59.3 |
40 |
3 |
| 50 |
79.8 |
40 |
4 |
| 100 |
68.3 |
40 |
4 |
| 150 |
62.3 |
40 |
4 |
| 200 |
60.0 |
40 |
4 |
| 250 |
59.0 |
40 |
4 |
| 50 |
75.1 |
40 |
5 |
| 100 |
66.7 |
40 |
5 |
| 150 |
62.8 |
40 |
5 |
| 200 |
59.0 |
40 |
5 |
| 250 |
54.0 |
40 |
5 |
| 50 |
95.1 |
35 |
6 |
| 100 |
86.0 |
35 |
6 |
| 150 |
77.6 |
35 |
6 |
| 200 |
70.0 |
35 |
6 |
| 250 |
66.7 |
35 |
6 |
| 50 |
93.3 |
35 |
7 |
| 100 |
87.1 |
35 |
7 |
| 150 |
79.7 |
35 |
7 |
| 200 |
74.3 |
35 |
7 |
| 250 |
73.0 |
35 |
7 |
| 50 |
98.3 |
35 |
8 |
| 100 |
92.4 |
35 |
8 |
| 150 |
89.0 |
35 |
8 |
| 200 |
84.3 |
35 |
8 |
| 250 |
83.0 |
35 |
8 |
| 50 |
96.6 |
35 |
9 |
| 100 |
88.2 |
35 |
9 |
| 150 |
85.1 |
35 |
9 |
| 200 |
81.4 |
35 |
9 |
| 250 |
78.6 |
35 |
9 |
| 50 |
95.8 |
35 |
10 |
| 100 |
89.0 |
35 |
10 |
| 150 |
84.0 |
35 |
10 |
| 200 |
81.0 |
35 |
10 |
| 250 |
80.0 |
35 |
10 |
For the analysis, they used an exponential extrapolation model for
the degradation curve and set the critical degradation to 55, as defined above. They
entered the collected data into ALTA's Degradation Analysis Folio, and the
data for each LED were individually fitted with a single curve.
Figure 1 shows the resulting 10
exponential curves.

Figure 1: Degradation Curves in ALTA 7
A time-to-failure was extrapolated from each curve. To transfer the failure
times to an ALTA Standard Folio, they clicked the Transfer Life Data to Selected
Folio(s) icon on the Data Sheet's Control Panel, as
shown in Figure 2, and selected an
existing Standard Folio. Figure 3 shows the calculated results.

Figure 2: Transfer Life Data to Selected Folio(s)

Figure 3: ALTA Standard Folio to Analyze the Failure Times
Extrapolated from the Degradation Analysis
The extrapolated failure times were transferred to a Standard Folio
with 2 stress levels and 5 failure times for each stress. They chose the
inverse power law as the life-stress model, and selected the Weibull distribution
as the failure time distribution. They also defined the normal use stress level of 27mA
by clicking the Set Use Stress link located near the bottom of the Control Panel
and entering the value in the Use Stress Level window. After calculation, the Control
Panel shows the parameter values for β, K, and n. To calculate the B10 life, they
opened the Quick Calculation Pad and entered the Current value
of 27mA and the BX% Information At value of 10 and found that
the B10 life for current of 27mA is about 1176 hours, as shown in Figure 4.

Figure 4: Calculating the B10 Life
using the Quick
Calculation Pad
Conclusions
In this article, we discussed degradation analysis using ALTA. As you
may know, Weibull++ also has a
degradation analysis tool. The difference
between these two degradation analyses is that in Weibull++, the
analysis is conducted at only one stress level (the use stress level) and
predictions are valid only for that stress level. In ALTA, the analysis is
conducted at elevated stress levels, and the extrapolation from the elevated
stress levels to the use stress level is based on the life-stress
relationship. Product performance can be predicted either at the use stress
level or at any level for which that life-stress relationship is applicable.
|