Related Topics: toprightheader.gif

Logistic Model

General Examples Using the Logistic Model

Discrete (Success/Failure) Data

Reliability Data

Parameter Estimation for the Logistic Model

The following examples will demonstrate the parameter estimation methods for the Logistic model.

Logistic Model Example 1

Using the reliability growth data given in Table 8.1, do the following:

  1. Find a Gompertz curve that represents the data and plot it with the raw data.
  2. Find a Logistic reliability growth curve that represents the data and plot it with the raw data.

Table 8.1 - Development time versus observed reliability data and predicted reliabilities

Time,
months

Raw Data
Reliability (%
)

Gompertz
Reliability (%
)

Logistic
Reliability (%
)

0

31.00

24.85

22.73

1

35.50

38.48

38.14

2

49.30

51.95

56.37

3

70.10

63.82

73.02

4

83.00

73.49

85.01

5

92.20

80.95

92.24

6

96.40

86.51

96.14

7

98.60

90.54

98.12

8

99.00

93.41

99.09

Solution to Logistic Model Example 1
  1. Figure 8.1 shows the entered data and the estimated parameters using the Standard Gompertz model.

Therefore:

MATH
MATH (3)

Figure

Figure 8.1: Estimated Standard Gompertz parameters for Example 1

The values of predicted reliabilities are plotted in Figure 8.2.

Figure

Figure 8.2: Gompertz Reliability vs. Time plot

Notice how the Standard Gompertz model is not really capable of handling the S-shaped characteristics of this data.

  1. The least squares estimators of the Logistic growth curve parameters are [9]:

MATH (4)

MATH (5)

where:

 MATH (6)

MATH (7)

MATH (8)

MATH (9)

In this example N = 9, which gives:

 MATH

From Eqns. (6) and (7):

 MATH

And from Eqns. (4) and (5):

MATH

Therefore, the Logistic reliability growth curve that represents this data set is given by:

MATH (10)

Figure 8.3 shows the Reliability vs. Time plot. The plot shows that the observed data set is estimated well by the Logistic reliability growth curve, except in the region closely surrounding the inflection point of the observed reliability. This problem can be overcome by using the Modified Gompertz model.

Figure

Figure 8.3: Logistic Reliability vs. Time plot

Logistic Model Example 2

A prototype was tested under a success/failure pattern. The test consisted of 15 runs and Table 8.2 presents the data from the test. Find the Logistic model that best fits the data set and plot it along with the reliability observed from the raw data.

Table 8.2 - Sequential success/failure data with observed reliability values

Time

Result

Observed
Reliability

0

F

0.5000

1

F

0.3333

2

S

0.5000

3

S

0.6000

4

F

0.5000

5

S

0.5714

6

S

0.6250

7

S

0.6667

8

S

0.7000

9

F

0.6364

10

S

0.6667

11

S

0.6923

12

S

0.7143

13

S

0.7333

Solution to Logistic Model Example 2

The first run is ignored because it was a success and the reliability at that point was 100%. This failure will be ignored throughout the analysis because it is considered that the test starts when the reliability is not equal to zero or one. The test essentially begins at time 1, and is now considered as time 0 with N = 14. The observed reliability is shown in the last column of Table 8.2. Keep in mind that the observed reliability values still account for the initial suspension.

 

Eqn. (9) becomes:

MATH

and:

MATH

Now, from the least squares estimators, Eqns. (6) and (7) are:

MATH

Therefore:

MATH

The Logistic reliability model that best fits the data is given by:

MATH

Figure 8.4 shows the Reliability vs. Time plot.

Figure

Figure 8.4: Logistic Reliability vs. Time plot

Logistic Model Example 3

Some equipment underwent testing in different stages. The testing may have been performed in subsequent days, weeks or months with an unequal number of units tested every day. Each group was tested and several failures occurred. The data set is given in columns 1 and 2 of Table 8.3. Find the Logistic model that best fits the data and plot it along with the reliability observed from the raw data.

Table 8.3 - Grouped per configuration data

Number of
Units

Number of
Failures

 Ti 

Observed
Reliability

10

5

0

0.5000

8

3

1

0.6250

9

3

2

0.6667

9

2

3

0.7778

10

2

4

0.8000

10

1

5

0.9000

10

1

6

0.9000

10

1

7

0.9000

10

1

8

0.9000

Solution to Logistic Model Example 3

The observed reliability is MATH and the last column of Table 8.3 shows the values for each group. With N = 9, Eqn. (9) becomes:

MATH

and:

MATH

Now from the least squares estimators, Eqns. (6) and (7) give:

MATH

Therefore:

MATH

The Logistic reliability model that best fits the data is given by:

MATH

Figure 8.5 shows the Reliability vs. Time plot.

Figure

Figure 8.5: Logistic Reliability vs. Time plot displaying the intervals