Related Topics: toprightheader.gif

Lloyd-Lipow Model

General Examples Using the Lloyd-Lipow Model

Discrete (Success/Failure) Data

Reliability Data

Parameter Estimation for the Lloyd-Lipow Model

When analyzing reliability data in RGA, you have the option to enter the reliability values in percent or in decimal format. However, $\hat{R}_{\infty }$ will always be returned in decimal format and not in percent. The estimated parameters in RGA are unitless.

Maximum Likelihood Estimators

For the kth stage: MATH And assuming that the results are independent between stages: MATH Then taking the natural log gives: MATH Differentiating with respect to $R_{\infty }$ and α yields: MATH (2)

MATH (3)Rearranging Eqns. (2) and (3) and setting equal to zero gives: MATH (4)

MATH (5)Eqns. (4) and (5) can be solved simultaneously for $\widehat{\alpha }$ and $\hat{R}_{\infty }$. It should be noted that a closed form solution does not exist for either of the parameters; thus they must be estimated numerically.

Least Squares Estimators

To obtain least squares estimators for $R_{\infty }$ and α, the sum of squares, Q, of the deviations of the observed success-ratio, Sk/nk, is minimized from its expected value, MATH, with respect to the parameters $R_{\infty }$ and α. Therefore, Q is expressed as: MATHTaking the derivatives with respect to $R_{\infty }$ and α and setting equal to zero yields:

 MATH (6)MATH (7)

Solving Eqns. (6) and (7) simultaneously, the least squares estimates of $R_{\infty }$ and α are: MATHor: MATH (8)and: MATHor: MATH (9)

Lloyd-Lipow Example 1

After a 20-stage reliability development test program, 20 groups of success/failure data were obtained and are given in Table 6.1. Do the following:

  1. Fit the Lloyd-Lipow model to the data using least squares.
  2. Plot the reliabilities predicted by the Lloyd-Lipow model along with the observed reliabilities and compare the results.

Table 6.1 - The test results and reliabilities of each stage calculated from raw data and the predicted reliability

Test Stage
Number

k

Number of
Tests
in Stage (
nk)

Number of
Successful
Tests (
Sk)

Raw Data
Reliability

Lloyd-Lipow
Reliability

1

9

6

0.667

0.7002

2

9

5

0.556

0.7369

3

8

7

0.875

0.7552

4

10

6

0.600

0.7662

5

9

7

0.778

0.7736

 

 

 

 

 

6

10

8

0.800

0.7788

7

10

7

0.700

0.7827

8

10

6

0.600

0.7858

9

11

7

0.636

0.7882

10

11

9

0.818

0.7902

 

 

 

 

 

11

9

9

1.000

0.7919

12

12

10

0.833

0.7933

13

12

9

0.750

0.7945

14

11

8

0.727

0.7956

15

10

7

0.700

0.7965

 

 

 

 

 

16

10

8

0.800

0.7973

17

11

10

0.909

0.7980

18

10

9

0.900

0.7987

19

9

8

0.889

0.7992

20

8

7

0.875

0.7998

Solution to Lloyd-Lipow Example 1

From Table 6.1, the least squares estimates are: MATHand: MATHSubstituting into Eqns. (8) and (9) yields: MATH

and:

MATHTherefore, the Lloyd-Lipow reliability growth model is as follows, where k is the test stage. MATH (10)

The reliabilities from the raw data and the reliabilities predicted from Eqn. 10 are given in the last two columns of Table 6.1. Figure 6.1 shows the plot. Based on the given data, the model cannot do much more than to basically fit a line through the middle of the points.

Figure

Figure 6.1: Comparison of the predicted reliability and the raw data