| Related Topics: | ||
|
General Examples Using the Lloyd-Lipow Model |
||
When analyzing reliability data in RGA, you have
the option to enter the reliability values in percent or in decimal format.
However,
will always be returned in decimal format and not in percent. The estimated
parameters in RGA are unitless.
For the kth
stage:
And
assuming that the results are independent between stages:
Then taking the natural log gives:
Differentiating with respect to
and α yields:
(2)
(3)Rearranging Eqns. (2) and (3) and setting equal to zero gives:
(4)
(5)Eqns. (4) and (5) can be solved simultaneously for
and
. It should
be noted that a closed form solution does not exist for either of the
parameters; thus they must be estimated numerically.
To obtain least squares estimators for
and α, the sum of squares,
Q, of the deviations
of the observed success-ratio, Sk/nk,
is minimized from its expected value,
, with respect to the
parameters
and α. Therefore,
Q is expressed as:
Taking
the derivatives with respect to
and α and setting equal
to zero yields:
(6)
(7)
Solving Eqns. (6) and (7) simultaneously, the least squares estimates
of
and α are:
or:
(8)and:
or:
(9)
After a 20-stage reliability development test program, 20 groups of success/failure data were obtained and are given in Table 6.1. Do the following:
Table 6.1 - The test results and reliabilities of each stage calculated from raw data and the predicted reliability
Test
Stage |
Number of |
Number of |
Raw Data |
Lloyd-Lipow |
1 |
9 |
6 |
0.667 |
0.7002 |
2 |
9 |
5 |
0.556 |
0.7369 |
3 |
8 |
7 |
0.875 |
0.7552 |
4 |
10 |
6 |
0.600 |
0.7662 |
5 |
9 |
7 |
0.778 |
0.7736 |
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
10 |
8 |
0.800 |
0.7788 |
7 |
10 |
7 |
0.700 |
0.7827 |
8 |
10 |
6 |
0.600 |
0.7858 |
9 |
11 |
7 |
0.636 |
0.7882 |
10 |
11 |
9 |
0.818 |
0.7902 |
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
9 |
9 |
1.000 |
0.7919 |
12 |
12 |
10 |
0.833 |
0.7933 |
13 |
12 |
9 |
0.750 |
0.7945 |
14 |
11 |
8 |
0.727 |
0.7956 |
15 |
10 |
7 |
0.700 |
0.7965 |
|
|
|
|
|
16 |
10 |
8 |
0.800 |
0.7973 |
17 |
11 |
10 |
0.909 |
0.7980 |
18 |
10 |
9 |
0.900 |
0.7987 |
19 |
9 |
8 |
0.889 |
0.7992 |
20 |
8 |
7 |
0.875 |
0.7998 |
From Table 6.1, the least squares estimates are:
and:
Substituting into Eqns. (8) and (9)
yields: 
and:
Therefore,
the Lloyd-Lipow reliability growth model is as follows, where k is the test stage.
(10)
The reliabilities from the raw data and the reliabilities predicted from Eqn. 10 are given in the last two columns of Table 6.1. Figure 6.1 shows the plot. Based on the given data, the model cannot do much more than to basically fit a line through the middle of the points.

Figure 6.1: Comparison of the predicted reliability and the raw data |