| Related Topics: | ||
The Duane model is a two parameter model. Therefore, to use this model as a basis for predicting the reliability growth that could be expected in an equipment development program, procedures must be defined for estimating these parameters as a function of equipment characteristics. Note that, while these parameters can be estimated for a given data set using curve-fitting methods, there exists no underlying theory for the Duane model that could provide a basis for a priori estimation.
This section of the on-line reference includes the following subsections:
Eqn. (2) may be linearized by taking the natural log of both sides:
(7)
Consequently, plotting
versus T on log-log
paper will result in a straight line with a negative slope, such that:

Similarly, Eqn. (4) can also be linearized by taking the natural log of both sides:
(8)
Plotting
versus T on log-log
paper will result in a straight line with a positive slope such that:

Two ways of determining these curves are as follows:
Table 4.1 - Sample Values for the Slope (α) for various equipment
Equipment |
|
Slope (α) |
Computer system |
Actual |
0.24 |
|
Easy to find failures were eliminated
|
0.26 |
|
All known failure causes were eliminated |
0.36 |
Mainframe computer |
|
0.50 |
Aerospace electronics
|
All malfunctions
|
0.57 |
|
Relevant failures only |
0.65 |
Attack radar |
|
0.60 |
Rocket engine |
|
0.46 |
Afterburning turbojet
|
|
0.35 |
Complex hydromechanical system |
|
0.60 |
Aircraft generator |
|
0.38 |
Modern dry turbojet |
|
0.48 |
During the design, development and test phase and
at specific milestones, the
is calculated from
the total failures and T
values. These values of
or
are plotted above the corresponding T
values on log-log paper. A straight line is drawn favoring these points
to minimize the distance between the points and the line, thus establishing
the improvement or growth model and its parameters graphically. If
needed, linear regression analysis techniques can be used to determine
these parameters.
A complex system's reliability growth is being monitored and the data set is given in Table 4.2. Do the following:
Table
4.2 - Cumulative test hours and the corresponding
observed failures for the complex system of Example 1
Point |
Cumulative |
Cumulative |
Cumulative |
Instantaneous |
1 |
200 |
2 |
100.0 |
100 |
2 |
400 |
3 |
133.0 |
200 |
3 |
600 |
4 |
150.0 |
200 |
4 |
3,000 |
11 |
273.0 |
342.8 |

Figure 4.2: Cumulative MTBF plot for Example 1 |

Figure 4.3: Instantaneous MTBF plot for Example 1 |
By changing the x-axis scaling, you are able to extend the line to T = 1. You can get the value of b from the graph by positioning the cursor at the point where the line meets the y-axis. Then read the value of the y-coordinate position at the bottom left corner. In this case, b is approximately 14 hr. Figure 4.4 illustrates this.

Figure 4.4: Cumulative MTBF plot for b ≈ 14 hr at T = 1 |
Another way of determining b
is to calculate α
by using two points on the fitted straight line and substituting the corresponding
and T values into:
(9)
Then substitute this α
and choose a set of values for
and T1
into Eqn. (4) and solve for b.
The slope of the line, α,
may also be found from Eqn. (8) or from:
(10)
Using the plot in Figure 4.2, at T1 = 200 hr,
hr. At T2 = 3,500 hr,
hr. From Figure 4.4, at b = 14 hr. when T = 1 . Substituting the first set of values, b
= 14 hr and ln1 = 0, into Eqn. (9) yields:

Substituting the second set of values, b = 14 hr and ln1 = 0 into Eqn. (9) yields:

Averaging these two α
values yields a better estimate of
.
(11)
Eqn. (12) is plotted in Figures 4.3
and 4.5. In Figure 4.5,
you can see that a parallel shift upward of the cumulative MTBF,
, line by
a distance of
gives the instantaneous MTBF, or the
, line.

Figure 4.5: Cumulative and Instantaneous MTBF vs. Time plot |
The parameters can also be estimated using a mathematical approach. To do this, apply least squares analysis on Eqn. (8):
(13)
And for simplicity in the calculations, let:

Therefore, Eqn. (13) becomes: ![]()
Assume that a set of data pairs (X1,Y1), (X2,Y2),..., (XN,YN) were obtained and plotted. Then according to
the Least Squares Principle, which minimizes the
vertical distance between the data points and the straight line fitted
to the data, the best fitting straight line to this data set is the straight
line
such that:

And where
and
are the
least squares estimates of a
and c. To obtain
and
, let:

Differentiating F with respect to a and c yields:
(14)
and:
(15)
Set Eqns. (14) and (15) equal to zero:

and:

Solve the equations simultaneously:

and:

Now substituting back ln(mci) = Yi, ln(b) = a, a = c and ln(Ti) = Xi, we have:
(16)
where:
(17)
Using the data from Table 4.2, estimate the parameters of the MTBF model using least squares.
From Table 4.2:

From Eqn. (17):

Also from Eqn. (16):

Therefore, Eqn. (4) becomes:
(18)
The equation for the instantaneous MTBF growth curve using Eqn. (6) is:
![]()
For the data given in columns 1 and 2 of Table 4.3, estimate the Duane parameters using least squares.
Table 4.3 - Failure times data
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) | (7) |
| Failure Number |
Failure Time (hr) |
ln(Ti) |
ln(Ti)2 |
mc |
ln(mc) |
ln(mc) • ln(Ti) |
| 1 | 9.2 | 2.219 | 4.925 | 9.200 | 2.219 | 4.925 |
| 2 | 25 | 3.219 | 10.361 | 12.500 | 2.526 | 8.130 |
| 3 | 61.5 | 4.119 | 16.966 | 20.500 | 3.020 | 12.441 |
| 4 | 260 | 5.561 | 30.921 | 65.000 | 4.174 | 23.212 |
| 5 | 300 | 5.704 | 32.533 | 60.000 | 4.094 | 23.353 |
| 6 | 710 | 6.565 | 43.103 | 118.333 | 4.774 | 31.339 |
| 7 | 916 | 6.820 | 46.513 | 130.857 | 4.874 | 33.241 |
| 8 | 1010 | 6.918 | 47.855 | 126.250 | 4.838 | 33.470 |
| 9 | 1220 | 7.107 | 50.504 | 135.556 | 4.909 | 34.889 |
| 10 | 2530 | 7.836 | 61.402 | 253.000 | 5.533 | 43.359 |
| 11 | 3350 | 8.117 | 65.881 | 304.545 | 5.719 | 46.418 |
| 12 | 4200 | 8.343 | 69.603 | 350.000 | 5.858 | 48.872 |
| 13 | 4410 | 8.392 | 70.419 | 339.231 | 5.827 | 48.895 |
| 14 | 4990 | 8.515 | 72.508 | 356.429 | 5.876 | 50.036 |
| 15 | 5570 | 8.625 | 74.393 | 371.333 | 5.917 | 51.036 |
| 16 | 8310 | 9.025 | 81.455 | 519.375 | 6.253 | 56.431 |
| 17 | 8530 | 9.051 | 81.927 | 501.765 | 6.218 | 56.282 |
| 18 | 9200 | 9.127 | 83.301 | 511.111 | 6.237 | 56.921 |
| 19 | 10500 | 9.259 | 85.731 | 552.632 | 6.315 | 58.469 |
| 20 | 12100 | 9.401 | 88.378 | 605.000 | 6.405 | 60.215 |
| 21 | 13400 | 9.503 | 90.307 | 638.095 | 6.458 | 61.375 |
| 22 | 14600 | 9.589 | 91.945 | 663.636 | 6.498 | 62.305 |
| 23 | 22000 | 9.999 | 99.976 | 956.522 | 6.863 | 68.625 |
|
Sum = | 173.013 | 1400.908 | 7600.870 | 121.406 | 974.242 |
To estimate the parameters using least squares, the values in columns
3, 4, 5, 6 and 7 are calculated. The cumulative MTBF, mc,
is calculated by dividing the failure time by the failure number. From
Eqn. (17),
is:

The estimator of b can be estimated from Eqn. (16):

Therefore, Eqn. (4) becomes:
![]()
Using Eqn. (6), the equation for the instantaneous MTBF growth curve is:
![]()

Figure 4.6: Duane plot for Example 3 |
For the data given in the Table 4.4, estimate the Duane parameters using least squares.
Table 4.4 - Multiple systems (known operating times) data
Run Number |
Failed Unit |
Test Time 1 |
Test Time 2 |
Cumulative Time |
1 |
1 | 0.2 | 2.0 | 2.2 |
2 |
2 | 1.7 | 2.9 | 4.6 |
3 |
2 | 4.5 | 5.2 | 9.7 |
4 |
2 | 5.8 | 9.1 | 14.9 |
5 |
2 | 17.3 | 9.2 | 26.5 |
6 |
2 | 29.3 | 24.1 | 53.4 |
7 |
1 | 36.5 | 61.1 | 97.6 |
8 |
2 | 46.3 | 69.6 | 115.9 |
9 |
1 | 63.6 | 78.1 | 141.7 |
10 |
2 | 64.4 | 85.4 | 149.8 |
11 |
1 | 74.3 | 93.6 | 167.9 |
12 |
1 | 106.6 | 103 | 209.6 |
13 |
2 | 195.2 | 117 | 312.2 |
14 |
2 | 235.1 | 134.3 | 369.4 |
15 |
1 | 248.7 | 150.2 | 398.9 |
16 |
2 | 256.8 | 164.6 | 421.4 |
17 |
2 | 261.1 | 174.3 | 435.4 |
18 |
2 | 299.4 | 193.2 | 492.6 |
19 |
1 | 305.3 | 234.2 | 539.5 |
20 |
1 | 326.9 | 257.3 | 584.2 |
21 |
1 | 339.2 | 290.2 | 629.4 |
22 |
1 | 366.1 | 293.1 | 659.2 |
23 |
2 | 466.4 | 316.4 | 782.8 |
24 |
1 | 504 | 373.2 | 877.2 |
25 |
1 | 510 | 375.1 | 885.1 |
26 |
2 | 543.2 | 386.1 | 929.3 |
27 |
2 | 635.4 | 453.3 | 1088.7 |
28 |
1 | 641.2 | 485.8 | 1127 |
29 |
2 | 755.8 | 573.6 | 1329.4 |
The solution to this example follows the same procedure as the previous example. Therefore, from Table 4.4:

For least squares, Eqn. (17) is used to estimate a:

The estimator of b can be estimated from Eqn. (16):

Therefore, from Eqn. (4):
![]()
Using Eqn. (6), the equation for the instantaneous MTBF growth curve is:
![]()
In "Reliability Analysis for Complex, Repairable Systems" (1974), L. H. Crow noted that the Duane model could be stochastically represented as a Weibull process, allowing for statistical procedures to be used in the application of this model in reliability growth. This statistical extension became what is known as the Crow-AMSAA (NHPP) model. The Crow-AMSAA provides a complete Maximum Likelihood Estimation (MLE) solution to the Duane model. This is described in detail in the Crow-AMSAA (NHPP) chapter of this on-line reference.