| Related Topics: | ||
|
Using the Power Low to Analyze Complex Repairable Systems |
||
Suppose that the number of systems under
study is K and the
qth
system is observed continuously from time Sq
to time Tq,
q =
1, 2, ... , K.
During the period [Sq,Tq], let Nq
be the number of failures experienced by the qth
system and let Xi,q
be the age of this system at the ith
occurrence of failure, i
= 1, 2, ... , Nq.
It is also possible that the times Sq
and Tq
may be observed failure times for the qth
system. If
then the data on the qth
system is said to be failure terminated and Tq
is a random variable with Nq
fixed. If
then the data on the qth
system is said to be time terminated with Nq
a random variable. The maximum likelihood estimates of λ and β
are values satisfying the Eqns. (4) and (5).
(4)
(5)
where 0ln0 is defined to be 0. In general,
these equations cannot be solved explicitly for
and
but must
be solved by iterative procedures. Once
and
have been
estimated, the maximum likelihood estimate of the intensity function is
given by:
If
S1 = S2 = ...= Sq = 0 and T1 =
T2
=...= Tq
(q
= 1, 2, ... , K) then the maximum likelihood estimates
and
are in closed
form.
(6)
(7)
The following examples illustrate these estimation procedures.
Example 1
For the data in Table 13.1, the starting time for each system is equal
to 0 and the ending time for
each system is 2000 hours. Calculate the maximum likelihood estimates
and
.
Table 13.1 - Repairable system failure data
System 1 (Xi1) |
System 2 (Xi2) |
System 3 (Xi3) |
1.2 |
1.4 |
0.3 |
55.6 |
35.0 |
32.6 |
72.7 |
46.8 |
33.4 |
111.9 |
65.9 |
241.7 |
121.9 |
181.1 |
396.2 |
303.6 |
712.6 |
444.4 |
326.9 |
1005.7 |
480.8 |
1568.4 |
1029.9 |
588.9 |
1913.5 |
1675.7 |
1043.9 |
|
1787.5 |
1136.1 |
|
1867.0 |
1288.1 |
|
|
1408.1 |
|
|
1439.4 |
|
|
1604.8 |
N1 = 9 |
N2 = 11 |
N3 = 14 |
Solution
Since the starting time for each system is equal to zero and each system
has an equivalent ending time, the general Eqns. (4) and (5) reduce to
the closed form Eqns. (6) and (7). The maximum likelihood estimates of
and
are then
calculated as follows: 

The system failure intensity function is then estimated by:
Figure 13.2 is a plot of
over the
period (0, 3000). Clearly, the estimated failure intensity function is
most representative over the range of the data and any extrapolation should
be viewed with the usual caution.

Figure 13.2: Instantaneous Failure Intensity vs. Time plot |