A 15-stage reliability development test program was performed. The grouped per configuration data that was obtained is given in Table 6.3. Do the following:
Fit the Lloyd Lipow model to the data using MLE.
What is the maximum reliability attained as the number of test stages approaches infinity?
What is the maximum achievable reliability with a 90% confidence level?
Table 6.3 - Grouped per Configuration data for Example 4
|
Figure 6.4 displays the entered data and the estimated Lloyd Lipow parameters.
The maximum achievable reliability as the number of test stages approaches infinity is equal to the value of R. Therefore, R = 0.7157.
The maximum achievable reliability with a 90% confidence level can be estimated by viewing the confidence bounds on the parameters in the QCP, as shown in Figure 6.5. The lower bound on the value of R is equal to 0.6691.
Figure 6.4: Estimated Lloyd Lipow parameters using MLE
Figure 6.5: Confidence bounds on the parameters
Given the reliability data in Table 6.4, do the following:
Fit the Lloyd Lipow model to the data using least squares analysis.
Plot the Lloyd Lipow reliability with 90% 2-sided confidence bounds.
Determine how many months of testing are required to achieve a reliability goal of 90%.
Determine what is the attainable reliability if the maximum duration of testing is 30 months.
Table 6.4 - Reliability data
|
Figure 6.6 displays the estimated parameters.
Figure 6.7 displays Reliability vs. Time plot with 90% 2-sided confidence bounds.
Figure 6.8 shows the number of number required to achieve a reliability goal of 90%.
Figure 6.9 displays the reliability achieved after 30 months of testing.
Figure 6.6: Estimate Lloyd Lipow parameters using least squares
Figure 6.7: Reliability vs. Time plot with 90% 2-sided confidence bounds
Figure 6.8: Number of months required to achieve a reliability of 90%
Figure 6.9: Maximum attainable reliability for a testing duration of 30 months
Find the Lloyd Lipow model that represents the data in Table 6.5 using MLE and plot it along with 95% 2-sided confidence bounds. Does the model follow the data?
Table 6.5 - Sequential data
|
Figures 6.10 and 6.11 demonstrate the solution. As it can be seen from the plot in Figure 6.11, the model does not seem to follow the data. You may want to consider another model for this data set.
Figure 6.10: Estimated Lloyd Lipow parameters using MLE
Figure 6.11: Reliability vs. Time plot with 95% 2-sided confidence bounds
Find the Lloyd Lipow model using least squares that represents the data in Table 6.6. This data set includes information about the failure mode that was responsible for each failure.
Table 6.6 - Sequential with Mode data
|
Figure 6.12 shows the analysis.
Figure 6.12: Estimated Lloyd Lipow parameters using least squares
See
Also:
Lloyd Lipow
Go to weibull.com
Go to ReliaSoft.com
©1992-2005. ReliaSoft Corporation. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.