Six systems were subjected to a reliability growth test and a total of 81 failures were observed. The start and end times, along with the times-to-failure for each system, are presented in Table 5.7. Do the following:
Estimate the parameters of the Crow-AMSAA model using maximum likelihood estimation.
How many additional failures would be generated if testing continued until 3000 hours?
Table 5.7 - Multiple Systems (Unknown Equivalent Times) data for Example 9
|
The parameters estimated using RGA are shown in Figure 5.18.
The number of failures can be estimated using the Quick Calculation Pad as shown in Figure 5.19. The estimated number of failures at 3000 hours is equal to . Therefore, the number of additional failures generated if testing continued until 3000 hours is equal to .
Figure 5.18: Estimated parameters of the Crow-AMSAA model
Figure 5.19: Estimate the number of failures at 3000 hours
A prototype of a system was tested at the end of one of its design stages. The test was run for a total of 300 hours and 27 failures were observed. The collected data is shown in Table 5.8. The prototype has a design specification of an MTBF equal to 10 hours with a 90% confidence level at 300 hours. Do the following:
Estimate the parameters of the Crow-AMSAA model using maximum likelihood estimation.
Does the prototype meet the specified goal?
Table 5.8 - Failure Times data for Example 10
|
The parameters estimated using RGA are shown in Figure 5.20.
Calculate the instantaneous MTBF with one-sided 90% confidence bounds using the Quick Calculation Pad (QCP) as shown in Figure 5.21. From the QCP, it is estimated that the lower limit on the MTBF at 300 hours with a 90% confidence level is equal to 10.8170. Therefore, the prototype has met the specified goal.
Figure 5.20: Estimated parameters of the Crow-AMSAA model
Figure 5.21: Instantaneous MTBF with one-sided 90% confidence bounds
See
Also:
Crow-AMSAA (N.H.P.P.)
Go to weibull.com
Go to ReliaSoft.com
©1992-2005. ReliaSoft Corporation. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.