In general, the MLE estimates of the parameters are asymptotically normal. This means that for large sample sizes the distribution of the estimates from the same population would be very close to the normal distribution [12]. If is the MLE estimate of any parameter, , then the ()% two-sided confidence bounds on the parameter are:
(18)
where represents the variance of and is the critical value corresponding to a significance level of on the standard normal distribution. [Note] The variance of the parameter, , is obtained using the Fisher information matrix. For parameters, the Fisher information matrix is obtained from the log-likelihood function as follows:
(19)
The variance-covariance matrix is obtained by inverting the Fisher matrix :


Once the variance-covariance matrix is known the variance of any parameter can be obtained from the diagonal elements of the matrix. Note that if a parameter, , can take only positive values, it is assumed that the follows the normal distribution [12]. The bounds on the parameter in this case are:

Using we get . Substituting this value we have:
(20)
Knowing from the variance-covariance matrix, the confidence bounds on can then be determined.
Example 11.2
Continuing with Example 11.1, the confidence bounds on the MLE estimates of the parameters , , and can now be obtained. The Fisher information matrix for the example is:

The variance-covariance matrix can be obtained by taking the inverse of the Fisher matrix :

Inverting returns the following matrix:

Therefore, the variance of the parameter estimates are:

Knowing the variance, the confidence bounds on the parameters can be calculated. For example, the 90% bounds () on can be calculated as shown next:

The 90% bounds on are (considering that can only take positive values):

The standard error for the parameters can be obtained by taking the positive square root of the variance. For example, the standard error for is:

The statistic for is:

The value corresponding to this statistic based on the standard normal distribution is:

The previous calculation results are displayed as MLE Information in the results obtained from DOE++ as shown in Figure 11.4. In the figure, the Effect corresponding to each factor is simply twice the MLE estimate of the coefficient for that factor. Generally, the value corresponding to any coefficient in the MLE Information table should match the value obtained from the likelihood ratio test (displayed in the Likelihood Ratio Test table of Figure 11.3). If the sample size is not large enough, as in the case of the present example, a difference may be seen in the two values. In such cases, the value from the likelihood ratio test should be given preference. For the present example, the value of 0.8318 for , obtained from the likelihood ratio test, would be preferred to the value of 0.8313 displayed under MLE information. For details see [12].
|
Figure 11.4: MLE information from DOE++ for Example 11.2. |